Toxic GM7MPHP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics84.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive266% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemToxic GM7MPHP  (all builds)
MotherboardToxic GM7MPHP
Memory21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200711
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateNov 22 '22 at 15:35
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 68.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 235
78% 142 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 807
77% 636 Pts
64-Core 1,095
68% 1,095 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super Mobile)
Device(1D05 108A) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2647
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.8% Excellent
Lighting 95.8
Reflection 158
Parallax 91.6
78% 115 fps
MRender 166
Gravity 103
Splatting 100
98% 123 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 105%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
294GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 929 783 798 797 792 795 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 2,359
Write 1,837
Mixed 1,651
SusWrite 816
372% 1,666 MB/s
4K Read 59.8
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 76.4
253% 86 MB/s
DQ Read 1,132
DQ Write 798
DQ Mixed 932
705% 954 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 266%
Great: 346%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-2666 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.8% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 12.5
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GM7MPHP Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: Toxic GM7MPHP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback