Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 14% Tree trunk	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo P8600-$42 8,502 User benchmarks, average bench 37% Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Memory 13.4 1-Core 13.1 2-Core 37.1 12% 21.2 Pts	4-Core 37.8 8-Core 50 6% 43.9 Pts	64-Core 48.5 3% 48.5 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 3,003 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 1872) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.39% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 1.9 Parallax 0.7 1% 1.4 fps	MRender 1.8 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 2.7 2% 1.8 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.39% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: 541ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 87 76 77 79 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	22.9% Poor	Read 60.7 Write 114 Mixed 79.8 SusWrite 79.6 19% 83.6 MB/s	4K Read 8.8 4K Write 16.8 4K Mixed 11.3 37% 12.3 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 79.2 DQ Mixed 96.5 71% 94.3 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	8.85% Terrible	MC Read 3 MC Write 3.3 MC Mixed 3.3 9% 3.2 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 1.5 5% 1.77 GB/s	Latency 374 11% 374 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 8.85% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo P8600Intel $42Bench 37%, 8,502 samples	4x
Core2 Duo T9400Intel $55Bench 39%, 3,295 samples	2x
Core2 Duo P8400Intel $20Bench 37%, 6,904 samples	1x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 3650ATIBench 2%, 3,003 samples	8x

SSD
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	1x
240GB 240GBNetacBench 66%, 2,483 samples	1x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	8x

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $77

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16