Today's hottest deals

Acer TravelMate P278-MG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive45.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer TravelMate P278-MG  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer TravelMate P278-MG
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '22 at 12:33
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
50.2% Above average
Memory 66.3
1-Core 31.6
2-Core 130
44% 75.9 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 202
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 1040) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.19% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 6.6
5% 5.6 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 9.4
6% 7.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.19%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV1-8B128 128GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: G871201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 108 115 116 126 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 320
Write 119
Mixed 161
SusWrite 119
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 8.3
50% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 177
DQ Mixed 108
116% 196 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$39
260GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 97 94 97 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 57.9
Write 67.7
Mixed 40.1
SusWrite 93.2
48% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.8
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 15.9
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TravelMate P278-MG Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate P278-MG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback