Panasonic FZG2-1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.99% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive97.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPanasonic FZG2-1  (all builds)
MotherboardPanasonic FZG2-1H
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '22 at 09:52
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10310U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
67% Good
Memory 60.6
1-Core 119
2-Core 240
74% 140 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 393
56% 410 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(10F7 8356) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.99% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 7
Parallax 7.4
5% 6.8 fps
MRender 9.8
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 12
8% 9.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.99%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDHBK512TDP 512GB
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU04.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 123 124 125 300 232 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Read 1,185
Write 120
Mixed 112
SusWrite 170
85% 397 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 37.5
4K Mixed 8.1
84% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 640
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 386
280% 380 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 212%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB TSOP LPDDR4 4000 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.5% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 26.7
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 21.2
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FZG2-1 Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Panasonic FZG2-1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback