ECS B75H2-M3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics60.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardECS B75H2-M3  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1862 x 1058 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131204
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateNov 21 '22 at 22:39
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User URY-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 90.3
2-Core 168
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 403
41% 332 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.2% Good
Lighting 74.3
Reflection 79.7
Parallax 72.8
61% 75.6 fps
MRender 68.1
Gravity 74.1
Splatting 74.9
60% 72.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 128GB-$74
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 105 130 131 129 131 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 306
Write 185
Mixed 203
SusWrite 120
45% 203 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 59
4K Mixed 30.4
106% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 30.5
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 41.3
40% 61.6 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 89%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
50GB free
Firmware: 505ABBF1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 108 130 131 129 131 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 186
Write 146
Mixed 154
SusWrite 120
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 54.9
4K Mixed 30.4
108% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 33
DQ Write 88.8
DQ Mixed 36.6
35% 52.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
119GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 106 104 107 106 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 95.3
Write 56.6
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 104
55% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.M16 Kingston 9905584-032.A00LF 12GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.7% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 11.1
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.6
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75H2-M3 Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS B75H2-M3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback