QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	13.3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 13.3GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	11.1 GB free of 13.2812 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 21 '22 at 21:21
Run Duration	116 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-12xx v2 (Ivy Bridge, IBRS) 61 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Memory 77.6 1-Core 93.9 2-Core 189 68% 120 Pts	4-Core 297 8-Core 307 40% 302 Pts	64-Core 321 20% 321 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185 33,175 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Asus(1043 047E) 3GB CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 22.6.1 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.5% Below average	Lighting 40.1 Reflection 46.3 Parallax 48.6 33% 45 fps	MRender 31.3 Gravity 42.9 Splatting 24.5 26% 32.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 34%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 193GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.5+ SusWrite @10s intervals: 207 89 51 54 54 53 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	Read 414 Write 329 Mixed 337 SusWrite 84.6 65% 291 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 40.4 4K Mixed 25.3 84% 28.4 MB/s	DQ Read 284 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 210 162% 222 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x13GB 144 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 1 of 1 slots used 13GB DIMM RAM Performing below potential (21^st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	58.3% Above average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 19 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 16.4 SC Mixed 18.1 49% 17 GB/s	Latency 85.1 47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 609 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	37x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	29x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	140x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	74x
1x12GBQEMUBench 78%, 4,175 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16