Dynabook PORTEGE X40L-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDynabook PORTEGE X40L-K  (all builds)
MotherboardDynabook OK011A/0000
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220624
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 21 '22 at 16:11
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i7-1270P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 32.8
1-Core 186
2-Core 330
90% 183 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 797
84% 674 Pts
64-Core 908
56% 908 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(3100 0003) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1368
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 23.3
Parallax 26.3
17% 23.4 fps
MRender 23.1
Gravity 27.8
Splatting 20.9
19% 23.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HBJD-00B00 256GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7401Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 353 368 570 444 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 1,002
Write 534
Mixed 622
SusWrite 354
140% 628 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 46.7
145% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 598
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 385
287% 393 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 125%
Great: 224%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
97.4% Outstanding
MC Read 35.7
MC Write 43.4
MC Mixed 35.3
109% 38.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 19.5
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 239
17% 239 ns
Poor: 94%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PORTEGE X40L-K Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Dynabook PORTEGE X40L-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback