MSI 970A-G46 (MS-7693)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.88% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7693
MotherboardMSI 970A-G46 (MS-7693)  (all builds)
Memory21 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160108
Uptime7 Days
Run DateNov 05 '17 at 13:04
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6100-$68
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 67.6
2-Core 130
59% 94.6 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 312
35% 274 Pts
64-Core 313
19% 313 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Sapphire(174B E198) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
5.88% Terrible
Lighting 7.77
Reflection 7.62
Parallax 6.97
6% 7.45 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 6.43
Splatting 6.04
5% 6.13 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.88%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
348GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 91.6
Write 103
Mixed 32.1
55% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.32
84% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 59%
Samsung HD250HJ 250GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FH100-06 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.1% Average
Read 81.8
Write 85.7
Mixed 38.1
50% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.49
4K Mixed 0.34
85% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 186C0 V3 Series KHX1866C10D3/8G 24GB
933, 800, 933 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.1% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 16.3
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 13.2
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970A-G46 (MS-7693) Builds (Compare 443 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI 970A-G46 (MS-7693) - $88

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $376
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback