Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateNov 20 '22 at 19:00
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 72
1-Core 134
2-Core 264
84% 157 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 890
85% 704 Pts
64-Core 1,398
86% 1,398 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.2% Above average
Lighting 65.6
Reflection 71
Parallax 64.8
54% 67.1 fps
MRender 65.4
Gravity 65.6
Splatting 62.4
53% 64.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme CT1000P 1TB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR020 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,396
Write 1,205
Mixed 857
256% 1,153 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 56
208% 72.7 MB/s
DQ Read 926
DQ Write 679
DQ Mixed 314
367% 640 MB/s
Poor: 128% Great: 299%
SSD 240GB
30GB free
Firmware: SBFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 156 145 160 147 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
68.7% Good
Read 420
Write 342
Mixed 314
SusWrite 176
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 59.9
4K Mixed 28.8
109% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 160
124% 168 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 95%
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
55GB free
Firmware: P2CR033 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 954
Write 1,431
Mixed 1,132
264% 1,173 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 52
182% 64.8 MB/s
DQ Read 716
DQ Write 626
DQ Mixed 792
561% 712 MB/s
Poor: 84% Great: 299%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
289GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 91 90 92 91 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 108
Write 93.2
Mixed 75.5
SusWrite 90.7
68% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 109%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB
48GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 48 49 49 50 68 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 67.5
Write 53.4
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 52.1
42% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G36C16U4B.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.7% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 28.3
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 26.9
64% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,844 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $935
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback