Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2620M 16,111 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Socket rPGA988B, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Memory 83.5 1-Core 74.7 2-Core 123 59% 93.7 Pts	4-Core 151 8-Core 159 20% 155 Pts	64-Core 159 10% 159 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 0004) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.89% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 2.4 Parallax 1.6 2% 2.03 fps	MRender 2.8 Gravity 2.6 Splatting 2.8 2% 2.73 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.89% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$44 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 256GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR045 SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 197 214 208 220 221 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	64.4% Good	Read 219 Write 237 Mixed 166 SusWrite 207 47% 207 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 43.4 4K Mixed 35.7 115% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 210 DQ Write 97.1 DQ Mixed 109 92% 138 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	42.7% Average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 15.7 41% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 12.8 36% 12.6 GB/s	Latency 74.3 54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	26x
Radeon HD 7400MAMDBench 2%, 4,688 samples	8x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	1x

SSD
THNSNF128GCSS 128GBToshibaBench 68%, 2,061 samples	2x
240GB 240GBSSDBench 64%, 5,968 samples	2x
MX500 500GBCrucial $44Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	2x

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $34

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16