HP EliteBook 8470p

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 8470p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 179B
Memory4.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190411
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateNov 20 '22 at 08:54
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3360M-$594
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 78.9
1-Core 76.2
2-Core 121
57% 91.9 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 190
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7500M
HP(103C 179D) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1501.0
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
3.81% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 4.2
4% 4.53 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 4
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.81%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM030-1RK17D 500GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 31.3
Write 41.3
Mixed 54
32% 42.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.6
148% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 67%
ADATA HD710 PRO 1TB
155GB free, PID a75a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 76.5
Write 81.2
Mixed 19.2
71% 59 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
38% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 55%
WD Elements 25A1 2TB
11GB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 77 61 58 65 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 57.8
Write 67.3
Mixed 43
SusWrite 72.9
83% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMT3170MN68F9F1600 Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
40.1% Average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 12.6
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 12.2
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8470p Builds (Compare 1,414 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8470p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback