Lenovo 20L50006MX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20L50006MX  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20L50006MX
Memory11.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220929
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 20 '22 at 08:00
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Memory 33.7
1-Core 88.4
2-Core 125
45% 82.3 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 229
26% 201 Pts
64-Core 289
18% 289 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Legend(17AA 225D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1122
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
3.56% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 6.7
3% 4.3 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 9
5% 5.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.56%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ256HBJD-00BL2 256GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L2QFXM7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 539
Write 412
Mixed 421
102% 457 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 12.6
4K Mixed 10.2
30% 9.83 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 258
193% 256 MB/s
Poor: 83% Great: 206%
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
213GB free
Firmware: 5L2QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 447
Write 410
Mixed 390
93% 416 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 6.2
20% 5.83 MB/s
Poor: 130% Great: 296%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Kingston KHX2400C14S4/16G 20GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
26.5% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 9
28% 9.93 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 5.3
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 234
17% 234 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback