Asus P8H67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H67  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '22 at 20:41
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$189
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 178
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 429
45% 363 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Lighting 42.4
Reflection 42
Parallax 39.5
35% 41.3 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 43
Splatting 28.3
29% 36.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 120 51 52 52 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 360
Write 360
Mixed 308
SusWrite 81.6
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 36.6
121% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 34.2
DQ Write 95.3
DQ Mixed 47.9
41% 59.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BA1339.M16F 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
41.7% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 13.4
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 14.1
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67 Builds (Compare 990 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $427
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback