Asus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics73.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '22 at 20:37
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 92
2-Core 179
72% 121 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 331
45% 335 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.2% Very good
Lighting 91.7
Reflection 89.6
Parallax 90
75% 90.4 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 80.4
Splatting 71.8
70% 88.1 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
898GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 135 161 153 141 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 160
Write 172
Mixed 33.8
SusWrite 141
92% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
56.1% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 17.3
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 16.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD Builds (Compare 538 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $222
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback