Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	31.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	40.6% Average	Memory 63.2 1-Core 28 2-Core 68.3 35% 53.2 Pts	4-Core 107 8-Core 102 14% 105 Pts	64-Core 138 8% 138 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 79%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: 505ABBF1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 98 94 97 93 99 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	Read 160 Write 99.2 Mixed 118 SusWrite 96.9 26% 119 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 20.6 4K Mixed 12.3 43% 14.5 MB/s	DQ Read 136 DQ Write 117 DQ Mixed 108 86% 120 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 73%
ASMT 2115 3TB 494 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 367GB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 84 82 87 85 93 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	40.7% Average	Read 115 Write 75.8 Mixed 61.2 SusWrite 86 109% 84.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 029E CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C8 029E CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 16GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1867, 1867, 1867, 1867 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	MC Read 11.4 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 10.9 35% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 8.5 20% 7.1 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 70%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	76x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	47x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	45x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 51%, 21,220 samples	23x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 74%, 7,519 samples	21x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 54%, 12,350 samples	14x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $696

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16