Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics46.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121115
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 19 '22 at 12:05
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 76%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Memory 74.2
1-Core 49.4
2-Core 93.8
46% 72.5 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 190
22% 169 Pts
64-Core 228
14% 228 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.5% Average
Lighting 60.6
Reflection 49.7
Parallax 57.1
49% 55.8 fps
MRender 42.5
Gravity 46.1
Splatting 57.5
41% 48.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV300S37A240G 240GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 82 106 61 23 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 339
Write 334
Mixed 261
SusWrite 88.2
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 27.7
4K Mixed 18.7
60% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 53.3
DQ Mixed 7.6
39% 94.7 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 92%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
464GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 124 123 121 126 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 91.3
Write 137
Mixed 64.6
SusWrite 120
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 75%
Seagate ST31500541AS 1.5TB
154GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 69 66 60 68 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 68.2
Write 84.5
Mixed 43.9
SusWrite 65
48% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CML8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1866C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
34.4% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 8.5
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 756 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback