Lenovo 20354

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive81.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20354  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 5A5
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140731
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateNov 19 '22 at 06:21
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 71.7
1-Core 67.8
2-Core 119
53% 86.3 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 170
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 840M
Legend(17AA 380D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1748
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
9.02% Terrible
Lighting 12.3
Reflection 9.6
Parallax 10.7
10% 10.9 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 8.4
7% 8.57 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.02%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 167 167 165 162 158 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 397
Write 408
Mixed 391
SusWrite 166
77% 341 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 59.3
4K Mixed 41.1
133% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 182
170% 265 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3160ME68FAF1600 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.5% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 15.8
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 13.6
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 97.6
41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20354 Builds (Compare 2,092 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20354

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback