Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	43.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246 143,007 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Memory 85.5 1-Core 80.1 2-Core 152 64% 106 Pts	4-Core 221 8-Core 222 30% 221 Pts	64-Core 235 15% 235 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% PowerColor(148C 2378) CLim: 1310 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.5% Average	Lighting 55.8 Reflection 51.9 Parallax 69.6 46% 59.1 fps	MRender 55.8 Gravity 58 Splatting 36.3 40% 50 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 56%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Acer SA100 480GB 444 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN10033 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 367 Write 366 Mixed 359 81% 364 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 45.6 4K Mixed 25.2 89% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 255 DQ Mixed 280 205% 267 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBSR 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBSR 16GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 16.5 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 14.5 40% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 71.6 56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	42x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	29x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 47,852 samples	24x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $849

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16