Gigabyte Z370 HD3P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics60% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
19 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemGigabyte Z370 HD3P
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 HD3P  (all builds)
Memory22.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180301
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateNov 18 '22 at 22:31
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$191
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Memory 94.3
1-Core 133
2-Core 255
91% 161 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 789
77% 629 Pts
64-Core 951
59% 951 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60% Good
Lighting 74.2
Reflection 87.2
Parallax 77.2
60% 79.5 fps
MRender 75.7
Gravity 74.5
Splatting 68.3
59% 72.8 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1293 1157 1199 1221 1167 960 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,686
Write 1,675
Mixed 850
SusWrite 1,166
301% 1,344 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 53.2
172% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 798
DQ Write 580
DQ Mixed 682
512% 687 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 223%
Great: 302%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
21GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 396
Write 396
Mixed 373
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 37.6
4K Mixed 28.6
92% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 171
DQ Mixed 187
136% 178 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2666 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 26.8
88% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 27.1
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 59.1
68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 HD3P-CF Builds (Compare 1,255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 HD3P - $115

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $544
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback