Lenovo 90DA00LPUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemLenovo 90DA00LPUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 30C7
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '22 at 22:38
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$51
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 75.5
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 176
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 243
32% 242 Pts
64-Core 242
15% 242 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Legend(17AA 30C7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
4.26% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 6.3
5% 5.77 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 7.7
Splatting 0.2
4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.26%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAJ20104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 373 372 386 403 401 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 402
Mixed 418
SusWrite 377
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 81.1
4K Mixed 30.6
134% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 119
125% 201 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.3% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 20.4
66% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 19.2
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90DA00LPUS Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90DA00LPUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $79
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback