Toshiba dynabook R734/M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemToshiba dynabook R734/M  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA dynabook R734/M
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '22 at 04:53
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4310M
Socket PGA946B, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 67.9
1-Core 76.9
2-Core 125
54% 89.9 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 160
21% 157 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 0007) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5070
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
2.75% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 5.5
2% 3.6 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.75%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM851 mSATA 128GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT4100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 37 33 34 34 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 409
Write 44.2
Mixed 70.7
SusWrite 35.8
30% 140 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 24.1
4K Mixed 16.4
74% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 39
DQ Mixed 47.7
68% 136 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
43.3% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 14.7
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 13.5
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical dynabook R734/M Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba dynabook R734/M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 4% - Terrible Total price: $116
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback