Intel H61

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
MotherboardIntel H61  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220224
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 16 '22 at 19:54
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 83.5
1-Core 78.3
2-Core 175
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 241
35% 257 Pts
64-Core 315
20% 315 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.01% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 1.2
3% 3.13 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 3.1
3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.01%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ES240SH 240GB
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0609B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 210 211 227 215 232 MB/s
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.2% Above average
Read 249
Write 212
Mixed 232
SusWrite 216
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 19.4
97% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 93.9
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 31
54% 103 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU7AFR8A-H9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 15.1
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 74.4
54% 74.4 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61 Builds (Compare 10,299 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H61

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback