Lenovo 10FDCTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10FDCTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SKYBAY
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '22 at 16:01
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$133
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 109
2-Core 214
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 287
39% 290 Pts
64-Core 301
19% 301 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720
MSI(1462 3130) 1GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
3.08% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 3.9
3% 3.77 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.08%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ediloca ES106 512GB
422GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW201105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 299 327 309 335 351 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 388
Write 252
Mixed 295
SusWrite 316
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 35.9
4K Mixed 8.4
60% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 14.8
54% 116 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 104%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
915GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 173 177 180 177 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 149
Mixed 97.4
SusWrite 177
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 102%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
75.7% Very good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 25.9
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 29.4
SC Mixed 22.9
65% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10FDCTO1WW Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10FDCTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $238
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback