Acer Aspire A514-52G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive140% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A514-52G  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Sneezy_WC
Memory6.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200328
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 16 '22 at 07:21
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 103
2-Core 166
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 355
39% 310 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 64%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX350
Acer(1025 139C) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4137
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 25.1
Reflection 25
Parallax 20.6
20% 23.6 fps
MRender 17.7
Gravity 10.8
Splatting 15.3
12% 14.6 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 512GB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 628 501 506 524 523 525 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
140% Outstanding
Read 851
Write 900
Mixed 838
SusWrite 535
176% 781 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 68
4K Mixed 41.2
140% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 726
DQ Write 608
DQ Mixed 663
498% 666 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 140%
Great: 157%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C15S4/8G Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 16.1
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 16.2
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A514-52G Builds (Compare 236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A514-52G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback