HP Pavilion All-in-One Desktop 32-b0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics49.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive314% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion All-in-One Desktop 32-b0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 892C
Memory8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220714
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 15 '22 at 15:15
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
12th Gen Intel Core i7-12700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Memory 79.5
1-Core 174
2-Core 314
102% 189 Pts
4-Core 619
8-Core 1,042
101% 830 Pts
64-Core 1076
67% 1076 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)
HP(103C 892C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1295
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.5% Average
Lighting 62.6
Reflection 68
Parallax 59.7
51% 63.4 fps
MRender 67.3
Gravity 53.2
Splatting 52.9
47% 57.8 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL21T0HCLR-00BH1 1TB
630GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3NGXH Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1965 2073 2098 2240 2237 1724 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 2,163
Write 2,201
Mixed 2,020
SusWrite 2,056
476% 2,110 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 73
239% 80.3 MB/s
DQ Read 842
DQ Write 376
DQ Mixed 752
520% 657 MB/s
Poor: 220%
This bench: 314%
Great: 436%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 32.1
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 24.5
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion All-in-One Desktop 32-b0xxx Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion All-in-One Desktop 32-b0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback