Lenovo 10AGS03400

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive67.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 18 months ago.
SystemLenovo 10AGS03400  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory12.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180821
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateNov 15 '22 at 06:39
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 73.6
1-Core 95.1
2-Core 185
67% 118 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 332
43% 323 Pts
64-Core 335
21% 335 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 375C) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.8
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 18.2
14% 18 fps
MRender 15.7
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 16.7
14% 17 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 480GB
283GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 118 217 125 224 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 418
Write 354
Mixed 306
SusWrite 173
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 34.2
4K Mixed 28
97% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 126
119% 187 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 106%
Apacer AS340 480GB
4GB free
Firmware: 103
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 391
Write 154
Mixed 131
49% 225 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 26.2
4K Mixed 23.8
81% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 77.3
DQ Mixed 112
94% 141 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL10 Series 1302 PSD34G160081 1302 1600 CL10 Series 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.8% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 14.4
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 93.2
43% 93.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10AGS03400 Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 10AGS03400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $186
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback