Lenovo 3354A73

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 3354A73  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3354A73
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120601
Uptime9.9 Days
Run DateNov 14 '22 at 20:18
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
52.1% Above average
Memory 80.1
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 107
55% 85.8 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 139
19% 141 Pts
64-Core 127
8% 127 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 5006) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.01% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 2.6
3% 2.7 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.4
3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.01%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545032A7E380 320GB
261GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GGBZB6C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 16 11 10 9.7 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
6.48% Terrible
Read 10.2
Write 12.9
Mixed 10.5
SusWrite 12.3
8% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 6.48%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 M471B5173BH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.6% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 13.7
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 6.9
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3354A73 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Lenovo 3354A73

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback