Asus VivoBook S14 X411UF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive90.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook S14 X411UF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X411UF
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '22 at 13:13
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 221
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 437
50% 388 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX130
Asus(1043 1101) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5763
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
9.55% Terrible
Lighting 12.3
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 12.6
10% 11.9 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 12.5
Splatting 8.6
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.55%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W256G1002 256GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6103002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 205 205 208 203 204 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 443
Mixed 335
SusWrite 224
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 38.6
137% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 272
223% 318 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 94%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
862GB free
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 109 109 111 114 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 128
Write 35.5
Mixed 52.1
SusWrite 102
58% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.7
225% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
70% Very good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 20.6
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 22
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 70%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook S14 X411UF Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook S14 X411UF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback