Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 25% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-5010U 11,105 User benchmarks, average bench 48% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	28.2% Poor	Memory 35.3 1-Core 26.4 2-Core 73.7 26% 45.1 Pts	4-Core 122 8-Core 125 16% 124 Pts	64-Core 125 8% 125 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) 231,498 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Intel(8086 2057) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	2.11% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 3 2% 2.33 fps	MRender 3.6 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 3.5 3% 3.1 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.11% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 256GB 12,871 User benchmarks, average bench 185% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: VB411D41 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 364 Write 279 Mixed 357 74% 333 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 12.4 4K Mixed 14.9 56% 15.9 MB/s	DQ Read 171 DQ Write 77.3 DQ Mixed 126 93% 125 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 273%
WD WD20SPZX-11CRAT0 2TB 18,166 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 815GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 88 90 89 99 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	40% Below average	Read 48.8 Write 69.4 Mixed 40.4 SusWrite 90.3 46% 62.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BF160B.M16 1315 16GB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	35% Below average	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 14.1 38% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 9.8 SC Mixed 5.8 24% 8.53 GB/s	Latency 225 18% 225 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,058x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	827x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	432x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16