Asus ZenBook UX534FAC_UX534FAC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus ZenBook UX534FAC_UX534FAC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UX534FAC
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 13 '22 at 20:35
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10510U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
47.9% Average
Memory 38.1
1-Core 83.7
2-Core 211
56% 111 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 273
43% 308 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1C71) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.13% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 7
Parallax 6.3
5% 6.3 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 8.6
6% 7.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.13%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+477G 512GB
423GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 386 349 311 393 384 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 542
Write 349
Mixed 431
SusWrite 362
94% 421 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 51.8
4K Mixed 37.6
162% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 275
201% 267 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 104%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4EBE3 4ED-EGCG 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
39.4% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 13.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 9.5
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 212
19% 212 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZenBook UX534FAC_UX534FAC Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ZenBook UX534FAC_UX534FAC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback