TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-16W1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.22% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GF65 Thin 9SEXR
MotherboardMSI MS-16W1  (all builds)
Memory17.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200519
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '22 at 20:22
Run Duration103 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
52% Above average
Memory 65.2
1-Core 58.2
2-Core 156
53% 93.3 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 322
33% 266 Pts
64-Core 420
26% 420 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 52%
 Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 12AA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.22% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 92
Parallax 6.5
4% 34.7 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 9.4
7% 7.97 fps
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 5.22%
 Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ5 256GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK12.D
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 602
Write 633
Mixed 397
121% 544 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 29.2
97% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 458
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 392
296% 399 MB/s
Poor: 76% Great: 136%
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
4GB free
Firmware: CXB73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,557
Write 1,048
Mixed 724
244% 1,110 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 41.6
144% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 510
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 432
315% 415 MB/s
Poor: 106% Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 859B CT16G4SFRA266.M16FRS 24GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
38% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 11.9
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 6.8
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 44% ↑
This bench: 38%
 Great: 83%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MS-16W1 Builds (Compare 4,738 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI MS-16W1

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples1,737x
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples1,702x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples496x
GPU
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples1,317x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples1,235x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples1,143x
SSD
OM8PCP3512F-AI1 512GBKingstonBench 135%, 20,980 samples956x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1032 512GBWDCBench 194%, 7,562 samples541x
MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GBSamsungBench 136%, 14,873 samples367x
RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples714x
HMA81GS6DJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 75%, 8,097 samples434x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples316x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback