Asus P8P67 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.86% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67 PRO  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '17 at 00:10
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 5.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 93.5
1-Core 119
2-Core 229
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 472
63% 471 Pts
64-Core 476
29% 476 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
EVGA(3842 2713) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.0
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.86% Terrible
Lighting 4.57
Reflection 4.35
Parallax 4.38
4% 4.43 fps
MRender 4.62
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.13
4% 4.88 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.86%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 410
Mixed 422
100% 448 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 93.1
4K Mixed 46.4
168% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 100
135% 248 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 112%
Great: 134%
WD Black 750GB (2008)-$140
513GB free
Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 105
Write 94.4
Mixed 91.1
73% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 2.36
4K Mixed 0.47
132% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-10666CL9-4GBSR F3-10666CL9-4GBRL F3-10666CL9-4GBSR 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52.7% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.7
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 PRO Builds (Compare 1,048 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO - $230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $849
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback