HP 870-200nn

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 870-200nn  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F1
Memory1.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840x2160x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '22 at 17:20
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 87
1-Core 81.4
2-Core 174
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 591
61% 490 Pts
64-Core 616
38% 616 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Asus(1043 884F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 175
Parallax 162
146% 172 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 138
Splatting 118
116% 146 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 129%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 174 171 168 173 168 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 387
Write 401
Mixed 308
SusWrite 186
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 75.7
4K Mixed 44.2
146% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 338
254% 341 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
125GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 43 45 48 57 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 23
Write 39.1
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 47.9
23% 31.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.2
41% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFD824A.C16FE Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.7% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 22.7
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 21.2
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 870-200nn Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

System: HP 870-200nn

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $286
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback