Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	45% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	133% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX705DT
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '22 at 16:20
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H 57,853 User benchmarks, average bench 53% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	59.6% Above average	Memory 61.3 1-Core 99.2 2-Core 192 65% 118 Pts	4-Core 311 8-Core 465 48% 388 Pts	64-Core 460 28% 460 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Asus(1043 10CF) ≥ 4GB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.32 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	45% Average	Lighting 57.8 Reflection 85.8 Parallax 52.6 47% 65.4 fps	MRender 49.6 Gravity 50.9 Splatting 49.1 41% 49.9 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 144 57 55 38 13 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	133% Outstanding	Read 1,205 Write 883 Mixed 810 SusWrite 105 167% 751 MB/s	4K Read 42.8 4K Write 96.3 4K Mixed 54.1 185% 64.4 MB/s	DQ Read 331 DQ Write 611 DQ Mixed 218 237% 387 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 209%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 101GB free Firmware: JU000D SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 89 94 91 93 95 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Read 131 Write 124 Mixed 57.2 SusWrite 93.3 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 160% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD CT8G4SFS8266.M8FE 16GB 154 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64.6% Good	MC Read 23.7 MC Write 24.2 MC Mixed 23 68% 23.6 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 22.7 SC Mixed 17.7 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 83%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

CPU
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	246x
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	244x

GPU
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	211x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	144x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	135x

SSD
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	267x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	111x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	20x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 48,644 samples	90x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	84x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	35x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16