Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics72.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte AB350-Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '22 at 11:03
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 71.4
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 207
69% 125 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 529
52% 425 Pts
64-Core 531
33% 531 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
PNY(196E 1325) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
72.3% Very good
Lighting 96.2
Reflection 92.1
Parallax 79.3
78% 89.2 fps
MRender 66.7
Gravity 80.8
Splatting 73.6
60% 73.7 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 256GB
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM13.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 314 313 319 276 211 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 750
Write 625
Mixed 382
SusWrite 287
114% 511 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 54
168% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 731
DQ Write 415
DQ Mixed 348
319% 498 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 126%
Great: 230%
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
85GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 164 139 137 137 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Read 404
Write 346
Mixed 306
SusWrite 152
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 35
127% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 186
162% 239 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 85%
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
198GB free
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 409 413 442 439 440 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 416
Mixed 426
SusWrite 403
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 71.5
4K Mixed 43.5
144% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 274
226% 323 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 104%
Great: 123%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 146 146 152 149 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 124
Write 126
Mixed 75.4
SusWrite 146
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.6
194% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2A2133C13 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2A2133C13 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
70.4% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 24.2
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 21.7
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 98.1
41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350-Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 1,136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback