Lenovo 82UF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics38.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive254% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82UF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '22 at 19:59
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Memory 68
1-Core 178
2-Core 364
104% 203 Pts
4-Core 681
8-Core 1,132
110% 906 Pts
64-Core 1,729
107% 1,729 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Arc A370M Graphics
Legend(17AA 3AE3) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3793
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Lighting 43.3
Reflection 37.3
Parallax 29.5
35% 36.7 fps
MRender 33.5
Gravity 56.5
Splatting 67.3
45% 52.4 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 39%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZAL41T0HBLB-00BL2 1TB
815GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7L1QHXC7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1279 1406 1438 1547 1494 1509 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
254% Outstanding
Read 1,803
Write 1,656
Mixed 1603
SusWrite 1,446
366% 1,627 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 62.4
213% 71.9 MB/s
DQ Read 920
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 692
496% 651 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 254%
Great: 366%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKCKC0BM-MGCP 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
139% Outstanding
MC Read 57.2
MC Write 52.8
MC Mixed 52.5
155% 54.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 47.7
SC Mixed 24.7
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 139%
Great: 148%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82UF Builds (Compare 200 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Lenovo 82UF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback