Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N4200 10,928 User benchmarks, average bench 30% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	24.1% Poor	Memory 37.1 1-Core 28.7 2-Core 48 24% 37.9 Pts	4-Core 65.4 8-Core 65.8 9% 65.6 Pts	64-Core 66.6 4% 66.6 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 7,629 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 39FB) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4565 Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	0.77% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 1.1 Parallax 0.9 1% 0.97 fps	MRender 1.2 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 1.1 1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.77% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$45 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 183GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 297 259 266 264 266 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	58.8% Above average	Read 320 Write 333 Mixed 298 SusWrite 274 69% 306 MB/s	4K Read 23.1 4K Write 27.2 4K Mixed 23.8 80% 24.7 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 84.6 DQ Mixed 97 73% 98.9 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 128%
WDC WD50 00LPCX-24VHA 500GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 73GB free, PID 0711 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 66 67 63 64 64 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Read 85.2 Write 87.9 Mixed 53.5 SusWrite 65.2 97% 72.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 100% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	19.1% Very poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 7.1 21% 7.27 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 1.8 8% 2.9 GB/s	Latency 216 18% 216 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium N4200IntelBench 30%, 10,928 samples	13x
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	13x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 7,629 samples	11x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	7x
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	6x

SSD
MZYTY128HDHP-000L2 128GBSamsungBench 75%, 1,392 samples	2x
P210 256GBPatriotBench 65%, 5,446 samples	2x
Solid State Disk 120GBSpccBench 59%, 22,489 samples	2x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	26x