Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 160%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 135%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics203% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58A-UD7  (all builds)
Memory20.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '22 at 01:02
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 X 990-$499
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Memory 95.1
1-Core 100
2-Core 202
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 574
58% 472 Pts
64-Core 675
42% 675 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Gigabyte(1458 403A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 4925 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 526.86
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
203% Outstanding
Lighting 289
Reflection 299
Parallax 342
235% 310 fps
MRender 360
Gravity 269
Splatting 194
216% 275 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 203%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Marvell Raid VD 0 960GB
856GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MV.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 216 218 221 222 223 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 352
Write 226
Mixed 245
SusWrite 217
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 32.5
4K Mixed 21.8
73% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 129
98% 132 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56%
Great: 114%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 434 444 457 454 449 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 625
Write 425
Mixed 186
SusWrite 438
93% 418 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 21.2
4K Mixed 2.5
23% 9.87 MB/s
DQ Read 73.6
DQ Write 42.5
DQ Mixed 19.1
25% 45.1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 426%
WD WD100EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB
9TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 199 199 198 187 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 187
Mixed 101
SusWrite 196
123% 168 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 7.5
4K Mixed 0.9
318% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 111%
Great: 113%
Gr0_2x50 0GB 1TB
926GB free
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 126 128 129 128 128 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83% Excellent
Read 158
Write 132
Mixed 100
SusWrite 127
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 2.5
728% 5.6 MB/s
WD Elements 25A3 10TB
9.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 197 214 209 203 202 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 202
Write 204
Mixed 127
SusWrite 203
248% 184 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 0.9
378% 4.6 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 5.7
DQ Mixed 1.1
233% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 105%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
57.4% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 24.6
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 11.8
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 56.9
70% 56.9 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X58A-UD7 Builds (Compare 418 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $376
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback