Samsung 900X5T

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	67.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	133% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

17 months ago, 17 months ago.

System	Samsung 900X5T (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NT900X5V-GD5A
Memory	2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색, , , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210920
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 10 '22 at 06:03
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	36%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8250U 234,942 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	61.6% Good	Memory 80.3 1-Core 90.9 2-Core 126 62% 99.2 Pts	4-Core 239 8-Core 306 35% 273 Pts	64-Core 304 19% 304 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$240 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Zotac(19DA 5527) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.47 Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	67.8% Good	Lighting 84.3 Reflection 81.8 Parallax 87.9 69% 84.7 fps	MRender 105 Gravity 76.7 Splatting 67.4 66% 83.1 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 76%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB70K1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 175 163 142 129 116 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	133% Outstanding	Read 1,492 Write 1,028 Mixed 688 SusWrite 183 187% 848 MB/s	4K Read 37.2 4K Write 61.4 4K Mixed 46.4 148% 48.3 MB/s	DQ Read 486 DQ Write 239 DQ Mixed 340 258% 355 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 236%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GB 36,396 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	56.5% Above average	MC Read 23.9 MC Write 19 MC Mixed 17.7 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 19 SC Mixed 13.4 44% 15.2 GB/s	Latency 80 50% 80 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 900X5T Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 900X5T

CPU
Core i7-8550UIntelBench 53%, 184,356 samples	32x
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples	8x
Core i3-8130UIntelBench 48%, 25,471 samples	4x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	36x
MX150-0NvidiaBench 14%, 29,453 samples	5x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	1x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	10x
CV8-8E256 256GBLiteonBench 72%, 1,612 samples	7x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000 256GBSamsungBench 180%, 361 samples	6x

RAM
M471A1K43BB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 23,910 samples	27x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 36,396 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16