Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513UA_M513UA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive209% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513UA_M513UA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X513UA
Memory16 GB free of 20 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220426
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '22 at 19:34
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 48.7
1-Core 140
2-Core 278
80% 156 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 764
76% 621 Pts
64-Core 975
60% 975 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 17C2) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.44.03
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 27.4
7% 17.8 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 21.3
Splatting 21.3
16% 18.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
702GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 926 980 1010 1100 1160 1175 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
209% Outstanding
Read 1,367
Write 1,257
Mixed 1,200
SusWrite 1,059
275% 1,221 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 46.6
172% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 944
DQ Write 700
DQ Mixed 830
618% 825 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 209%
Great: 488%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 CT16G4SFRA32A.M16FRS 20GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
66.6% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 23.9
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 24.5
SC Mixed 21.3
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 165
24% 165 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513UA_M513UA Builds (Compare 458 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X513UA_M513UA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback