Lenovo 82MJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics40.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive164% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82MJ  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '22 at 18:33
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 71.6
1-Core 156
2-Core 309
94% 179 Pts
4-Core 606
8-Core 952
96% 779 Pts
64-Core 1195
74% 1195 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Legend(17AA 3A5D) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.10.3
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
40.8% Average
Lighting 50.6
Reflection 52.9
Parallax 47.6
41% 50.4 fps
MRender 61.9
Gravity 46
Splatting 42.1
40% 50 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 45%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme IM2P33F4 256GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B114215 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 305 998 266 269 778 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 1,473
Write 80.8
Mixed 877
SusWrite 502
161% 733 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 28.2
178% 72 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 656
DQ Mixed 107
197% 380 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 164%
Great: 175%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AL1P32NC8T1-B8DS 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.5% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 12.7
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 14.1
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 97.7
41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82MJ Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82MJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback