Asus H97M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H97M-E  (all builds)
Memory18.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '22 at 17:56
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770S-$112
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 164
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 497
52% 415 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.14% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 69.6
Parallax 6.2
3% 26.4 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.14%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-256M6S 2.5 7mm 256GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC86201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 388 383 358 361 361 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 445
Write 380
Mixed 261
SusWrite 369
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 29.4
104% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 190
171% 259 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 101%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 755GB
529GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 64 64 63 64 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.5% Above average
Read 123
Write 128
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 63.8
67% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 64%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$55
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 101 102 100 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 93.3
Write 81.9
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 101
63% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 67%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
68GB free
Firmware: AX0R2J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 64 64 63 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 60.5
Write 53.1
Mixed 26
SusWrite 63.8
37% 50.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 99U5584-005.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8G 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.8% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 10.3
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 11.7
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M-E Builds (Compare 2,559 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-E - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $277
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback