HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3397
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime13 Days
Run DateNov 08 '22 at 17:25
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G2130
Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G2130 @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Memory 61.1
1-Core 65.3
2-Core 111
48% 79.1 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 130
15% 117 Pts
64-Core 88
5% 88 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 310
HP(103C 094E) 512MB
CLim: 523 MHz, MLim: 437 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 392.65
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.21% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 0.3
1% 1.53 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.21%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon IT LCS-128L9S-HP 128GB
12GB free
Firmware: 9C08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 174 192 171 195 188 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.5% Below average
Read 163
Write 129
Mixed 147
SusWrite 179
35% 154 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 22.6
4K Mixed 15.2
52% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 105
88% 126 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 98%
Corsair Voyager GTX 1TB
834GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 23 22 22 22 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
8.85% Terrible
Read 25.4
Write 22.4
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 22
5% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 5.2
22% 5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 8.85%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 43 32 37 55 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 24.1
Write 47.3
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 36.7
24% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8C-PB Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 HMT41GU6BFR8C-PB Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
43.6% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 13.5
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 10.3
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,436 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback