Lenovo 82J4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 82J4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '22 at 16:49
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N6000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Memory 28.8
1-Core 68.6
2-Core 141
41% 79.4 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 85.6
22% 143 Pts
64-Core 92.4
6% 92.4 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3806) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9955
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
3.63% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 2.3
4% 3.83 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 5
Splatting 5.7
4% 4.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.63%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KBG40ZMT128G TOS 128GB
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0109AELA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 600 560 566 216 222 223 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 733
Write 682
Mixed 680
SusWrite 398
140% 623 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 26.8
4K Mixed 23.2
74% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 211
152% 198 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 186%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung U6E3S4AA-MGCR 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.5% Poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 10.7
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 4.8
13% 4.7 GB/s
Latency 262
15% 262 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82J4 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82J4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback