TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI Z170A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM EDITION

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive331% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7968
MotherboardMSI Z170A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM EDITION  (all builds)
Memory57.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '22 at 21:57
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 90.1
1-Core 140
2-Core 276
93% 169 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 690
73% 581 Pts
64-Core 632
39% 632 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑
This bench: 88.9%
 Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
MSI(1462 397D)
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 125
Parallax 122
110% 127 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 100
Splatting 96.3
89% 112 fps
Poor: 90% ↑
This bench: 103%
 Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1236 1714 2033 2149 2114 2082 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
331% Outstanding
Read 2,406
Write 2,312
Mixed 2,235
SusWrite 1,888
498% 2,210 MB/s
4K Read 62.1
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 81.1
258% 85.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,020
DQ Write 714
DQ Mixed 909
667% 881 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑
This bench: 331%
 Great: 528%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$39
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 171 172 175 174 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 164
Mixed 90.2
SusWrite 171
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
231% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 104%
 Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3400 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.5% Excellent
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 26.6
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 25.3
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 68% ↑
This bench: 80.5%
 Great: 115%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z170A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM EDITION(MS-7968) Builds (Compare 513 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z170A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM EDITION - $175

CPU
Core i7-6700KIntel  $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples355x
Core i5-6600KIntel  $113Bench 72%, 342,244 samples47x
Core i7-7700KIntel  $249Bench 84%, 712,312 samples42x
GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples99x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples58x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples41x
SSD
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung  $330Bench 223%, 54,978 samples27x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $90Bench 251%, 262,559 samples15x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples14x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GBCorsairBench 83%, 15,511 samples24x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples14x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples12x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $870
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback