bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware7,1
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1536 x 630 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '22 at 20:19
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
CPU 0, 3 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
44.5% Average
Memory 46.2
1-Core 39.3
2-Core 79.4
33% 55 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 343
36% 287 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 215GB
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 48 54 53 65 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 95.9
Write 82.9
Mixed 73.1
SusWrite 59.3
58% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 3.6
563% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
VMware Virtual RAM VMW-16384MB 1x16GB
1 of 128 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 42.1
MC Write 50.9
MC Mixed 47.2
134% 46.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 7.9
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 111%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,468 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback