Lenovo 10AEA09FUK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics3.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemLenovo 10AEA09FUK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200611
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 07 '22 at 13:53
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Memory 32.2
1-Core 23.7
2-Core 32.3
20% 29.4 Pts
4-Core 37.9
8-Core 32.2
5% 35.1 Pts
64-Core 14.1
1% 14.1 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Legend(17AA 309B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4474
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
3.06% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 6
3% 3.9 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.06%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 187 203 140 167 131 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.5% Below average
Read 258
Write 252
Mixed 152
SusWrite 174
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 24.9
4K Mixed 16.4
54% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 30.1
DQ Write 48.4
DQ Mixed 28.8
25% 35.8 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 0702 1GX64B160K HYN 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
MC Read 3.2
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 3
9% 3.03 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 5.6
14% 4.77 GB/s
Latency 242
16% 242 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10AEA09FUK Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10AEA09FUK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $39
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback