Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 27% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C50D-B (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA ZBWAE
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150826
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 07 '22 at 12:10
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-6410 APU R5 Graphics 19,683 User benchmarks, average bench 32% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	25.4% Poor	Memory 35.9 1-Core 31.4 2-Core 60 26% 42.4 Pts	4-Core 88.7 8-Core 83.5 12% 86.1 Pts	64-Core 96.5 6% 96.5 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 40,685 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 F917) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.6.1 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	2.14% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 3.8 Parallax 3.6 2% 3.23 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 2.6 Splatting 4.1 3% 3.13 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.14% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB 7,332 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS1A30Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 209 258 235 50 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	43.8% Average	Read 346 Write 268 Mixed 259 SusWrite 172 58% 261 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 26.8 4K Mixed 6.9 49% 17 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 12.9 39% 84.1 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 43.8% Great: 93%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 441GB free Firmware: AM0P3M SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 97 97 98 105 104 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	57.9% Above average	Read 103 Write 100 Mixed 32.6 SusWrite 99.1 61% 83.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 CT51264BF160B.C16F 8GB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 4.1 MC Mixed 5.3 14% 4.97 GB/s	SC Read 4.2 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 4.2 11% 3.77 GB/s	Latency 222 18% 222 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 24%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
E1-6010 APU R2 GraphicsAMDBench 22%, 1,618 samples	9x
A4-6210 APU R3 GraphicsAMDBench 30%, 5,378 samples	9x
A8-6410 APU R5 GraphicsAMDBench 32%, 19,683 samples	4x

GPU
Radeon R3 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 6,021 samples	9x
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 1%, 7,644 samples	9x
Radeon R5AMDBench 2%, 40,685 samples	4x

SSD
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $30Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	1x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x
Fury 120GBHyperX $160Bench 64%, 11,403 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	7x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	4x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	2x

Value: 19% - Very poor

Total price: $30

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16