HP 20-r200nf

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics1.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive14.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemHP 20-r200nf  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B56
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160120
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 07 '22 at 07:44
Run Duration268 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-6015 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 8.2
2-Core 13.2
5% 10.7 Pts
4-Core 11.9
8-Core 10.2
2% 11 Pts
64-Core 10.8
1% 10.8 Pts
Poor: 8% Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2
HP(103C 2B56) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1301.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.32% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 2
Parallax 1.9
1% 1.73 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 2
Splatting 2.6
2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.32%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ldlc F7+480GB 480GB
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0510A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 72 112 52 130 53 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.8% Very poor
Read 200
Write 146
Mixed 155
SusWrite 70.4
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.2
9% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 CT102464BF160B.C16 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
4.67% Terrible
MC Read 1.2
MC Write 1.2
MC Mixed 2.2
4% 1.53 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 1.4
SC Mixed 1.9
5% 1.73 GB/s
Latency 780
5% 780 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 4.67%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20-r200nf Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP 20-r200nf

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback