Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics43.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory14.3 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160531
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 06 '22 at 01:54
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 75.3
1-Core 64.7
2-Core 124
54% 87.9 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 329
33% 270 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1350 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.Q2
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.3% Average
Lighting 51.9
Reflection 56.7
Parallax 89.3
42% 66 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 66.2
Splatting 44.2
45% 56.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SHGS31-500GS-2 500GB
298GB free
Firmware: 90000Q00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 311 313 275 247 242 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 229
Write 292
Mixed 274
SusWrite 282
61% 269 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 30
98% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 31.2
DQ Write 84.1
DQ Mixed 43.3
37% 52.9 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 109%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 119GB
111GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 135 128 129 127 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 360
Write 261
Mixed 247
SusWrite 153
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 28.3
96% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 32
DQ Write 76.2
DQ Mixed 39.7
34% 49.3 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
460GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 112 102 125 129 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 144
Write 122
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 114
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 109%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
207GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 64 63 61 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 104
Write 106
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 62.3
109% 83 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
41.2% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 14.9
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 9.6
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $517
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback